Although no gene-edited crops have yet been commercially released under newly-relaxed regulations, numerous crops are in development and could be approved for market in the years ahead. Indian public sector research laboratories are developing, among other crops, rice and maize that can tolerate drought stress; beta carotene-rich banana; high oleic and low linoleic acid ground […]
India: Crops / Food Read More »
Although the research capacity is lacking in Central America, most countries have GM regulations in place. Some technically allow for the limited cultivation of GM crops, but only Costa Rica and Honduras are growing them. There has been a considerable amount of cross-border harmonization of regulations on developing guidance on gene-edited crops. Nascent support for
Central America: Crops / Food Read More »
Uruguay has no specific regulations for gene-edited crops. In 2018, Uruguay and 12 other nations, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil and the US, issued a joint statement to the World Trade Organization supporting relaxed regulations for gene editing, stating that governments should “avoid arbitrary and unjustifiable distinctions” between crops developed through gene editing and crops developed
Uruguay: Crops / Food Read More »
Gene-edited crops are regulated as conventional plants unless they contain foreign DNA, after a form is submitted to determine if they are exempt. Gene edited crops are assessed on a case-by-case basis by the Ministry of Agriculture’s Agricultural and Livestock Services (SAG). In 2017, SAG published a regulatory approach on new breeding techniques (NBTs), stating that
Chile: Crops / Food Read More »
Israel has not determined the regulatory status of gene editing in animals. There is no commercial production of GE animals in Israel. Products/Research Female-only mice: Tel Aviv University researchers used CRISPR in 2019 to develop a system in mice that produces more female offspring than males. The goal is to use the system in farm
Chile has not determined the regulatory status of gene editing in animals. There is little research and no products in development. Products/Research Disease resistance in salmon: Favet-Inbiogen, a biotechnology company, used CRISPR in 2017 to increase the genetic disease resistance in salmon. Regulatory Timeline None NGO Reaction None Additional Resources Genetic Literacy Project’s FAQ on
Mexico has not determined the regulatory status of gene editing in animals. Gene-edited products are regulated under laws established for transgenic GMOs, which are highly restrictive. There is little research and no products in development. Products/Research None Regulatory Timeline 2016: The Mexican state of Yucatan declares itself “GMO” free zone, including all genetically engineered crops
There are no approved gene edited crops or prospects for approval in the near future. Currently, they fall under highly restrictive laws established for transgenic GMOs, similar to the European Union and New Zealand. Mexico has not reported any biotechnology food or feed products approvals since May 2018. Herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant cotton is the only
Mexico: Crops / Food Read More »
Gene-edited crops and food are regulated as conventional plants unless they contain foreign DNA, after a dossier is submitted to determine if they are exempt. Gene-edited crops are assessed on a case-by-case basis based on the characteristics of the final product, not on the process used to develop the product. There are no commercially available
Israel: Crops / Food Read More »
According to a federal program announced in 2019, some gene editing techniques will be exempt from a 2016 law that banned the cultivation of genetically engineered organisms except for research purposes. The decree establishing the program describes gene editing as equivalent to conventional breeding methods, the view adopted by most of the world except for
Gene editing is a set of techniques that can be used to precisely modify the DNA of almost any organism. It is being used for applications in human health, gene drives and agriculture. There are numerous gene-editing tools besides CRISPR-Cas 9, which gets most of the attention because it is a comparatively easy tool to use.
Gene editing does not usually involve transgenics – moving ‘foreign’ genes between species. It also refers to a specific technique in contrast to the general term GMO, which is scientifically ambiguous, as genetic modification is a process not a product. Most gene editing involves creating new products by deleting very small segments of DNA (sometimes in agriculture called Site-Directed Nuclease 1 or SDN-1 techniques), which can silence a gene or change a gene’s activity. Countries are evaluating whether or not to regulate this type of gene editing, since it is so similar to natural mutations. The GLP’s Gene Editing Index ratings reflect the regulatory status of SDN-1 techniques, which are the most liberally regulated and will generate most products in the near term.
To develop different products, gene editing can change larger segments of DNA or add DNA from other species (a form of transgenics sometimes in agriculture called SDN-2 or SDN-3 techniques). While many countries are not regulating or lightly regulating SDN-1 techniques, most are moving toward tightly regulating or even restricting SDN-2 and SDN-3.
For more background on the various gene editing SDN techniques, read background articles here and here.